Re: Rclactgrp

[Nathan Andelin <nandelin@xxxxxxxxx>]

The CGI API works fine regardless of the front-end CLP. 

But why add the overhead of new activation groups?

Nathan Andelin 


> On Sep 15, 2020, at 5:25 AM, Jay Vaughn <jeffersonvaughn@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> I have an endpoint pgm that is called from an http instance. 
> This pgm creates a named actgrp in which other pgms called run in as well. 
> I’m discovering that if I recompile one of these called pgms then the change is not picked up the next time the instance calls my endpoint program... unless I restart the instance. 
> This tells me the actgrp from the first endpoint pgm needs to be reclaimed... but how would you do that if it is the very first pgm in the stack?  It is an sqlrpgle and I tried doing the rclmactgrp after the *inlr=*on but no luck. 
> I think putting a cl wrapper around it would be logical but I would then have a mess on my hands sharing/passing those Cgidev Parms from my CLP to my sqlrpgle right?  Or would they still be accessible by the sqlrpgle regardless of the CLP?
>
> Tia
> Jay
> -- 
> This is the RPG programming on IBM i (RPG400-L) mailing list
> To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
> or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at https://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.
>
> Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related questions.
>
> Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate link: https://amazon.midrange.com