|
On Jul 30, 2020, at 5:28 PM, Javier Sanchez <javiersanchezbarquero@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Because in RPG, you may use the *+=* operator to shorten the expression
like:
SEQN = SEQN + 1 ;
into
SEQN +=1;
In "C" this would be
SEQN++;
All this, of course, has the solution of writing two lines of code. I was
bringing the subject to illustrate that the logical example I gave before
does work, put more clearly, like:
*IN50 = (myValue = 5);
does compile perfectly well, and indicator 50 will be *ON if myValue is 5.
JS
message: 4--
date: Thu, 30 Jul 2020 22:53:35 +0200
from: Carel <coteijgeler@xxxxxxxxx>
subject: Re: Evaluation of expression within parenthesis
Why the second assign (=) character?
This is the RPG programming on IBM i (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.
Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related questions.
Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate link: https://amazon.midrange.com
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.