×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
My belief is that adding columns will make no difference to SQLRPGLE using SELECT * via static SQL.
-----Original Message-----
From: Vernon Hamberg [mailto:vhamberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Monday, May 04, 2020 10:20 AM
To: RPG programming on IBM i <rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Implicitly hidden column & EXTNAME D/S
An interesting thought, Justin - the evidence of the I-specs that the pre-compiler adds suggests you are right.
Now that also suggests to me that, if one uses SELECT *, then, if columns are added, they will not be seen - no I-spec for the new columns.
Or is this just a Monday-morning fancy I'm going through?
Cheers
Vern
On 5/4/2020 10:15 AM, Justin Taylor wrote:
Unless I'm mistaken, the pre-compiler resolves the SELECT * at compile-time, so the result is the same as explicitly listing the columns.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.