Re: File with LikeRec Data-Structure Template -vs- ExtName Data-Structure Template -- RPG400-L

Again, perfectly explained. I really appreciate the additional
information. I grasped what Jon was saying about adding additional fields
to the data-structure, but didn't consider that when NOT adding additional
fields, the compiler would still be looking for the end-ds statement. I
appreciate you both taking the time to thoroughly answer my questions.
Have a great rest of the day.

On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 12:53 PM Charles Wilt <charles.wilt@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

EXTNAME simply retrieves the structure of the file at compile time...

So no, you don't have to re-compile the program unless you have a
requirement to pick up the new definition..

One such use case, you have _dynamic_ SELECT * SQL statement...

A static SELECT * isn't a problem given the way the pre-compiler works...

Though SELECT * in production is generally a bad idea.

As far as an END-DS, jon covered the reason...EXTNAME allows you to add
fields to the DS...

dcl-ds myds extname(mytable);
extraFld1 char(10);
extraFld2 char(15);
end-ds;

Assuming MYTABLE has 5 columns, the myDS structure above will have 7
subfields...

Charles

On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 10:43 AM Robert Jacobs <robertjacobsit@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

That's a great explanation. Thanks, Jon!

Are you also able to verify that, when using the extName keyword, a

change

to the physical file would not require a re-compile of the program,

unless

the change was to a field explicitly referred to?

Finally, I do still wonder why the end-ds is required for an extName
data-structure, but not a likeRec data-structure. It's not straight
forward what the issue is when encountered in RDi (when you leave out the
end-ds), so it took me a bit to even realize that's what was causing a
problem. I also had to account for extName template not being qualified

(I

expected the template keyword to make the data-structure qualified
automatically) as opposed to the likeRec template being qualified by
default (a result of the likeRec keyword), but that's just a nitpick.

On Wed, Oct 16, 2019 at 10:11 AM Jon Paris <jon.paris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

I can't think of any real advantage to using the file approach - unless
you plan on passing the file as a parm - which is primarily what

templated

files are for.

The ExtName approach also has the advantage that additional fields

and/or

redefinitions can be added to the DS. A LikeRec cannot be used in that

way.

--
This is the RPG programming on IBM i (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.

Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related
questions.

Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate
link: https://amazon.midrange.com

--
This is the RPG programming on IBM i (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.

Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related
questions.

Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate
link: https://amazon.midrange.com