Re: Latest RPG Updates

Jon

Could operational descriptor support help with any of this?

Vern

On 10/9/2019 1:24 AM, Jon Paris wrote:

"I'm not convinced it would be impossible."

Not impossible no - b ut it requires work at the OS level - RP{G could

not do it by itself in any meaningful fashion. At present the information
is just not stored anywhere in the compiled objects. Foe example a program
knows its maximum an minimum number of parameters - but not what type of
data and size they should be. Same with service program procedures. that
data is just not stored by the system. The closest we come is when the
compiler generates on request the PCML data for a call. But even that would
require a lot more work before it could be used for the type of
introspection needed. PCML currently can only support a subset of the full
range of data that can be passed as parameters - so PCML has to be enhanced
significantly before you can even think of using it as the foundation for a
call mechanism.

Not saying it wouldn't be nice - just that I don't see it happening any

time soon.

On Oct 8, 2019, at 9:24 PM, Peter Dow <petercdow@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I remember having this same feeling about having to include PIs and PRs

for every procedure. That eventually was resolved at the local level. Yes,
it would be a lot more work for the compiler to have to look at the service
program to determine the prototypes for each candidate procedure; I'm not
convinced it would be impossible. Same thing with procedure prototypes.

My understanding of programs and other objects on the IBM i is that

they can be composed of object subtypes, for example a file has metadata,
index data, actual data, etc. To make things simpler for the compiler, how
about a subtype object containing the prototypes?

I know, Barbara does a great job and has more than enough work just

adding all the other things we want RPG to do, and this is not that big a
deal. I just don't like to think that it's impossible.

On 10/8/2019 4:37 PM, Jon Paris wrote:

I thought that is what I had said Peter - but yes ALL have to be

present otherwise how would the overload one know which to pick? If they
are not there it has nothing to compare with.

The only time that an overloaded prototype is not required is for

procedures that are local and the parameter information can de derived from
the procedure interface.

On Oct 8, 2019, at 3:52 PM, Peter Dow <petercdow@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Yes, but my question is, are the candidate prototypes *required*, or

just the overloading prototype? If it is indeed fundamentally a compiler
directive, then it would seem they are all required. And if they're all
required, one might as well use the candidate prototypes.

On 10/8/2019 1:21 PM, Jon Paris wrote:

Basically the rules haven't changed. For a procedure/program to be

called, a prototype (or the PI for internals) must be present.

That includes the overloading proto. Normally I would have all (say)

three protos in a /Copy source - I'm just going to add the overload one to
that set. No increase in work except for the original definition of the
overload proto.

This is all a compile time function and as I said earlier

fundamentally a compiler directive in a different form.

On Oct 8, 2019, at 1:11 PM, Peter Dow <petercdow@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Jon,

Assuming the FORMAT procedure and its candidate procedures are all

in a service program, how do I use it in another RPG program? I would
guess that I have to put the prototype in the RPG program, yes? Do I have
to put all the candidate prototypes in there too? My thought was the RPG
program using it would simply have

Dcl-Pr Format Override( ProcA, PgmB, JavaC );


but now that I put it that way, the compiler would have to go to

the service program to check my usage against each of those candidate
prototypes to see if it's allowed.

--
*Peter Dow* /
Dow Software Services, Inc.
909 793-9050
petercdow@xxxxxxxxx <mailto:petercdow@xxxxxxxxx>
pdow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:pdow@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

/
On 10/8/2019 12:14 PM, Jon Paris wrote:

FORMAT is never exported because it is only really a compiler

directive.

For example thing of it this way.

Dcl-Pr Format Override( ProcA, PgmB, JavaC );

This is handled by the compiler much like a conditional

compilation directive such as ...

/IF ParmMatches ProcA
CallP ProcA(parm);
/ELSEIF ParmMatches ProcB
CallP PgmB(parm);
/ELSE
....

It is that simple.

On Oct 8, 2019, at 11:28 AM, Justin Taylor <JUSTIN@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>

wrote:

Is FORMAT exported? There will be times when I want it exported

and other times I don't. My best guess is that it inherits from the actual
procedures.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jon Paris [mailto:jon.paris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, October 08, 2019 1:04 PM
To: RPG programming on IBM i <rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: Latest RPG Updates

Actually it doesn't matter if the procedure is exported or not.

In fact the overloaded routines can include programs, Java calls, and
subprocs.

--
This is the RPG programming on IBM i (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.

Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related

questions.

Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our

affiliate link: https://amazon.midrange.com

--
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
--
This is the RPG programming on IBM i (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.

Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related

questions.

Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our

affiliate link: https://amazon.midrange.com

--
This is the RPG programming on IBM i (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.

Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related

questions.

Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our

affiliate link: https://amazon.midrange.com

--
This is the RPG programming on IBM i (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.

Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related

questions.

Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate

link: https://amazon.midrange.com

--
This is the RPG programming on IBM i (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.

Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related
questions.

Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate
link: https://amazon.midrange.com