×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
No, I wasn't. I would never recommend lying to an auditor. I was
saying to describe it as a UUID in concept. Simply a unique number, not
a sequence. Actually, this is better than a UUID although I doubt that
most auditors understand that a UUID is actually NOT guaranteed to be a
unique number.
My point is that the fact that you're generating the unique number using
a counter does NOT mean it has to be described as a sequence.
On 8/2/2019 7:58 AM, Rob Berendt wrote:
Dieter,
I think Joe was saying lie to the auditors. Not to use a UUID but to just describe it as a UUID. However the first time they see 1, 2, 3, 4 they'd have to be a complete idiot of an auditor to think those were UUID's.
Rob Berendt
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.