On Thu, Jan 31, 2019 at 5:27 PM Barbara Morris <bmorris@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

The compiler code for scanning free-form definitions is almost all the
same as for fixed-form code, and there are a few things available in
fixed form columns that the compiler needs so it knows which direction
to take.

It's a fascinating glimpse into language design and compiler design.

Has there been any thought given to the idea of an RPG V? It would a
great opportunity to completely exorcise fixed-form, and maybe rework
some things so that the language is more maintainable and extensible.
(That latter thing is just a pure guess on my part. I have zero actual
knowledge of RPG internals.)

The compiler takes completely different paths for externally-described
vs program-described data structures, so it needs to know right away
what it's dealing with.

Could the scanner not incorporate some amount of look-ahead (i.e., put
off some decisions until more information has been scanned)? I mean,
some keywords *can* be moved around, both in fixed and free, so....

Earlier you said the free-form scanner code is "almost the same" as
the fixed-form scanner code. Why almost? Why isn't there a single
codebase which serves both? If they are separate anyway, why couldn't
the free-form scanner be made deliberately less similar? (And again,
maybe this is something for RPG V.)

Please don't take this as grilling. It's more just musing. I have
incredible respect for language designers and implementers, and in
particular for those who have worked or are still working on RPG.

John Y.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2019 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].