× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



I'm sure my single XML-INTO was still not quite right, which may be causing the slowdown. The five individual XML-INTO commands get by without allowmissing, but the single XML-INTO can't. The single XML-INTO loaded the data structure and all my tests passed, but it still showed something missing.

I'll check the vendor docs and see if they have any sample XML files. If so, I'll send you a copy off-list.



-----Original Message-----
From: Jon Paris [mailto:jon.paris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Tuesday, August 28, 2018 12:35 PM
To: Rpg400 Rpg400-L <rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: XML-INTO & path

I am really surprised that it is slower to do all of it at once rather than in pieces - can't think of a logical reason why that would be. You'd think a single parse would always have to be faster than multiples.

You can still use the count option to avoid allowmissing even if processing it in pieces.

If you have a test XML file you can send me I'd love to see it - might be the next article!


Jon Paris

www.partner400.com
www.SystemiDeveloper.com



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.