×

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.




Hi John,

To me it is quite simple: procedure interface has its own keywords for
start and end, which should be placed between start and end of procedure
declaration. So they should be indented.

Isn't the parm-line between dcl-pi and end-pi part of the procedure
interface? So why is that one indented?

Maybe the dcl-proc could have been implemented more like other languages
as:

dcl-proc Proc (parm char(1) value) ind;

But it wasn't :-)

Joep Beckeringh
Software architect
Pantheon Automatisering B.V.
Heerenveen

john erps <jacobus.erps@xxxxxxxxx>

15-01-2018 10:10

Question about dcl-proc

Hi,

I notice that many specify a procedure as follows:

dcl-proc Proc;

dcl-pi *n ind;
parm char(1) value;
end-pi;

code (procedure body) follows

dcl-s x ind;

...

end-proc;

Instead of:

dcl-proc Proc;
dcl-pi *n ind;
parm char(1) value;
end-pi;

code (procedure body) follows

dcl-s x ind;

...

end-proc;

The difference being that in the first example the dcl-pi part has the
same
indentation level as the procedure body. For me it would seem that the
second example is more logical, because dcl-pi is part of the procedure
declaration, not part of the procedure body, and should have the
indentation level of the procedure declaration.

Any thoughts?

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.