Re: 2nd & 3rd parm on %dec()

Yes because not every expression that uses %dec() or the right hand side
looks like:

fielda = %dec(fieldb)

What about those instances where %dec() is part of a more complex
expression? I am sure you can conceive of one complex enough that the
precision and scale of the result will not match that of %dec(). Also what
about:

evalh fielda = %dec(fieldb)

In this case the scale of fieldb needs to be larger than that of fielda or
the evalh will be meaningless.

On Mon, Oct 16, 2017 at 12:53 PM, Justin Taylor <JUSTIN@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

When using the %dec() function, is it unreasonable to think the compiler
could check the result field, and default the 2nd and 3rd parameters?

I'm thinking about submitting an RFE, but I want to check to make sure I'm
not overlooking the obvious.

Thanks
--
This is the RPG programming on the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries) (RPG400-L)
mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: https://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at https://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.

Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related
questions.

Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate
link: http://amzn.to/2dEadiD