Re: Who the bloody eff still codes CABEQ in this century?!?!?!? -- RPG400-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

"RPG400-L" <rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on 07/19/2017 05:24:37
PM:

----- Message from Jon Paris <jon.paris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> on Wed, 19
Jul 2017 17:19:47 -0400 -----

To:

Rpg400 Rpg400-L <rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>

Subject:

Re: Who the bloody eff still codes CABEQ in this century?!?!?!?

I did actually raise an internal requirement at IBM for both the
COBOL and RPG compilers to allow a user-specified list of "illegal"
op-codes which would have achieved this purpose. The idea was to
make it simpler for shops to impose coding standards.

Could never convince any of my teammates to go for it though.

Jon Paris

www.partner400.com
www.SystemiDeveloper.com

Our home-grown change management does a scan for this kind of stuff. Then
either our System Administrator (who does the actual promotion) or I take
it back to the developer and have them change it. I assume commercial
products either have this kind of function or have exit points where a
shop can hook in their own code to do it.

Michael Quigley
Computer Services
The Way International
www.TheWay.org

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2025 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.