×

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.




Why does people still hang in the 80 char punchcard line length paradigm?
With a modern
editor you may have up to 200 char so why not chose a long length if one
dosn't move the
source-code to the IFS. Nobody says you have to use it for every statement
but it may be
practical some times.

On Tue, Jun 6, 2017 at 8:43 PM, Nathan Andelin <nandelin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

That discussion reference of Barbara was quite informative and gave good
reasons for keeping code within 80 characters or less, avoiding overly
statements, etc.
--
This is the RPG programming on the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries) (RPG400-L)
mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.

Please contact support@xxxxxxxxxxxx for any subscription related
questions.

Help support midrange.com by shopping at amazon.com with our affiliate
link: http://amzn.to/2dEadiD





As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.