RE: Using the RPG Cycle -- RPG400-L

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.

Subject: RE: Using the RPG Cycle
From: dlclark@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: Fri, 5 May 2017 16:09:43 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l/>
List-help: <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: "RPG programming on the IBM i \(AS/400 and iSeries\)" <rpg400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:rpg400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/options/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

"RPG400-L" <rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote on 05/05/2017 04:06:17
PM:

I seem to recall that these two aren't identical and the *inL1 won't
operate as desired.

1.
if *inl1;
exsr L1TOTAL;
endif;

2.
CL1 exsr L1TOTAL

I accept that if the group 1. statements are in detail
calculations. However, if the group 1. statements are in total-time
calculations then I don't see why they wouldn't work just fine. In fact,
my test today demonstrated that they absolutely did work as desired.

Sincerely,

Dave Clark

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.