× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



On Wed, Jan 20, 2016 at 1:05 AM, Birgitta Hauser <Hauser@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
'yyyy-mm-ddThh:mm:ss' is not a valid character representation of a
timestamp. The only valid representation is the ISO format,
'YYYY-MM-DD.HH.MI.SS.MSMSMS'.

To be clear about terminology, the form with the 'T' *is* ISO format,
according to the international ISO 8601 standard (though usually it is
followed by time zone information). IBM's "ISO" timestamp format does
NOT adhere to the international standard, despite the name.

As usual, IBM likes to do things their own way and use conflicting
terminology. It's true that IBM's "ISO" format is the format that is
*most* compatible with ISO 8601, of the ones available on the i.

John Y.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.