× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



In hindsight, researching how the logic cycle works may have been a quicker option. Hard to tell.

-----Original Message-----
From: Jon Paris [mailto:jon.paris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Friday, January 15, 2016 12:29 PM
To: Rpg400 Rpg400-L <rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: INTEGER & VARCHAR() on I-specs

" I'm wicked comfortable ...” - but that is the problem Buck. Maintainability should not rely on the skills of one person.

I stopped using the cycle when a) I found that I was fighting it more than it was helping and b) When it took 5 - 10 times longer to educate new programmers in how to modify complex cycle programs than if it had been written using “normal” techniques.

Cycle is fine for genuine one-offs but beyond that I stay well clear.

Can’t help but wonder if the OPs original program couldn’t have been rewritten in less time than it took to research and fix the VarChar problem.



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.