× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. RPG400-L
  3. December 2015

Re: Possible intereting SETLL behavior

Hi Dan

Good things to check - I have been pretty careful, but one is one's own worst editor, right?

Yes, for the file NOT to be processed by key, I have to leave the RAT blank - in free form, just leaving off the word "keyed".

Here are the f-specs - in free format -

DCL-F titles disk(*EXT) USAGE(*INPUT) usropn infds(tds);
DCL-F titlesl1 disk(*EXT) USAGE(*INPUT) KEYED usropn
infds(tl1ds) rename(TITLESR : TITLESL1R);

Program compiles OK.

NEXT!! :)

Vern


On 12/8/2015 10:10 AM, Dan wrote:
Vern,

It's been ages since I've done RRN access, but I seem to recall that the
Record Address Type on the file's F spec must be blank. If you're using
the same F-spec as when you were using the alpha key, I'm guessing the RAT
might be 'K'.

But, I'd be surprised that the program would compile in such a scenario.
Are there any errors in the job log that you didn't catch?

- Dan


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.