× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



On 5 Dec 2015, Scott Klement wrote:

Whether a subprocedure is in the same/diff activation group is irrelevant. And whether it's in the same/diff program/module/srvpgm object is >irrelevant.

That's what I thought, too. I've debugged the SP to ensure that the call stack entry parameter name agrees with the value for SflPgmQ in the display file (which it does).

So, I'm going back to checking the code in the calling program some more. Just wanted to be sure I wasn't overlooking something obvious. Thanks...

--
Buzz


________________________________

This electronic mail transmission may contain confidential or privileged information. If you believe that you have received this message in error, please notify the sender by reply transmission and delete the message without copying or disclosing it.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...


Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.