×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
On 27-Nov-2015 10:16 -0600, Justin Taylor wrote:
I have an RPGLE program that calls a 3rd party Java app. Right now it
does a handful of RUNJVA using QCMDEXC. I'm trying to call the Java
directly from RPGLE because I think I'll get better performance on
repeat calls. <<SNIP>>
Calling the CL command interpreter QCMDEXC so as to invoke the Run
Java Program (RUNJVA) CL command that then will invoke the Java code?
With that conspicuous indirection, can that really be described
legitimately as having "call[ed] the Java directly from RPGLE".? Coding
the method call via the Java Native Interface (JNI) from the RPGLE would
seem much more direct.? I do not know enough about the effect of a Java
Program that previously might have been "created and associated with the
class file" in that scenario, but the implications of both "better
performance" and "directly" seem tenuous.?
[
http://www.ibm.com/support/knowledgecenter/ssw_ibm_i_71/cl/runjva.htm]
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
