|
----- Message from "Englander, Douglas"-----
<Douglas_Englander@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> on Thu, 17 Sep 2015 11:56:52 -0500
differently.
To:
"rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx" <rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject:
RPG date functions vs. Excel date functions
I am reading an excel spreadsheet via RPG (using Scott Klements
routines). There is one cell containing the number 40999, which excel
interprets as March 31, 2012. The 40999 representing the number of
days from January 1, 1900 (January 1, 1900 would be represented as 1).
If I initialize a base date in RPG (a *ISO date field) to December 31,
1899, and add the excel number to it (converted to days), I am
expecting to get the date that excel is converting 40999 to (i.e. I
would expect RPG to calculate December 31, 1899 + %days(40999) to be
March 31, 2012 also). However, no matter how I do it, RPG calculates
December 31, 1899 + %days(40999) to be April 1, 2012.
Does anyone have any idea as to why the calculations differ by one
day? I trust IBM over Microsoft, and would take the April 1, 2012
date, but I would like to know why the two dates are calculated
--
Thank you,
Doug
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.