Re: Standard source file names?

[Dan <dan27649@xxxxxxxxx>]

One source file, QSRC.  In addition to the ease of navigating to source of
different types by keeping it in the same source file, it helps ensure that
object names are not duplicated across different object types.

- Dan

On Mon, Mar 30, 2015 at 4:00 PM, Bob Cagle <bcagle@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> A friend of mine has gifted me a copy of his home-grown change management
> tool, but it requires the standard IBM names for source files, and has
> hard-coded them in all of the tool's programs.
>
> He was shocked when I informed him that I don't use the standard names,
> and so this tool won't work as is.
> I was shocked that he didn't allow for different names since the original
> intent was to sell this tool on the open market.
>
> So I'm curious - what is your stance on source files?  Do you use the
> standard IBM convention QDDSSRC, QRPGSRC, QRPGLESRC, etc., etc.?
>
> Or custom names?
>
> Single or multiple files for different source types?
>
> Why?
>
>
>
> Thanks
>
> Bob Cagle
> IT Manager
> Lynk, Inc.
>
> --
> This is the RPG programming on the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries) (RPG400-L)
> mailing list
> To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
> or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.