×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015, Bob Cagle wrote:
So I'm curious - what is your stance on source files? Do you use the
standard IBM convention QDDSSRC, QRPGSRC, QRPGLESRC, etc., etc.?
Or custom names?
Single or multiple files for different source types?
Why?
We use the standard IBM names for several reasons:
1. Many IBM commands already default to using them.
2. Different record lengths for different source types makes sense.
3. Improves organization for us. For example, a typical C open source
project might have header files in directories like config, documentation
in doc, XML in xml, C code in src, etc. So splitting source code up
between several source files on the i seems logical.
James Rich
if you want to understand why that is, there are many good books on
the design of operating systems. please pass them along to redmond
when you're done reading them :)
- Paul Davis on ardour-dev
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
