× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. RPG400-L
  3. October 2014

Re: tmpnam() not unique

That would be very disappointing... IBM says that tmpnam() will generate a unique filename.

Does it say somewhere that this is based on the timestamp?? (which certainly isn't unique!)

On 10/14/2014 8:19 AM, McGovern, Sean wrote:
I've believe I have encountered an issue with my use of tmpnam().

If 2 jobs use tmpnam() at the same timestamp moment, I *think* the same filename is returned (though I don't know how to test this scenario).

I haven't coded to handle this possibility, and end up with two jobs trying to create the same temporary IFS file.

I was thinking that a solution could be just prefix/suffix the job number to the filename returned by tmpnam().

Does that seem like a feasible solution ?




As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow-Ups:
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.