|
This idea of a BASEDds would be a nice feature.
Having such a feature in DDS would be nice, too.
Today, I am building an Audit File that will track an existing master file's updates.
All I am adding are fields like USER and TIMESTAMP, and because of this, I have to list all the Fields in DDS that are in the Master.
And when I am done, I will not have DSPDBR relationship between the Master File and the Audit File.
(The names are similar, but I cannot build a relationship known to the database between the two files.)
- John Voris
Re: Add flattened subfields after likeds--
no good solution. something like "baseDS" would be a nice feature:
D TestDS DS baseds(C1DS)
D ZZ1 1
D ZZ2 1
and then allow the derived data struct to be passed to a proc that expects a parm that is likeds the based struct.
This is the RPG programming on the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries) (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact copyright@midrange.com.
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.