× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Thank you all for your responses. I found the issue. In order to show
you all an example of the program/service program I decided to create a
stripped down version of them. In doing so I realized I was missing one
thing in the program that was in the service program. For these types of
procedures we add an SQL option so that sorting will be case insensitive.
When I add this to the program I end up with the same results as the
service program. And if I remove it from the service program I get the
faster results.

C/EXEC SQL
C+ SET OPTION SRTSEQ=*LANGIDSHR
C/END-EXEC

Eileen Beckwith
Vermont Information Processing
eileen@xxxxxxxxxx



From: Vernon Hamberg <vhamberg@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "RPG programming on the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries)"
<rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 07/22/2014 06:02 PM
Subject: Re: Embedded SQL in a Service Program versus in a Program
Sent by: "RPG400-L" <rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx>



Eileen

Forgive my pressing!

You mention "stored procedure" here - what kind is it? An external one
using RPG? So far as I know, a stored procedure is something created
using the CREATE PROCEDURE statement in SQL.

Thx
Vern

On 7/22/2014 4:13 PM, Scott Mildenberger wrote:
Can we see the procedure prototype to see how the parameters are coded?

Scott

-----Original Message-----
From: RPG400-L [mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
Eileen@xxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Tuesday, July 22, 2014 3:07 PM
To: RPG programming on the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries)
Cc: RPG400-L
Subject: Re: Embedded SQL in a Service Program versus in a Program

- which did you run first?
I have done both ways

- did you run CLRPOOL and/or SETOBJACC to get the table out of memory?
Level playing field and all
I did not but I have run this multiple times on mulitple days
and always get the same results.


- it might be helpful to run a monitor over this to see what the
optimizer is doing
I did turn on a SQL Performance Monitor and could not see any
difference except the run times

- when you say "called the service program", do you mean you called the
procedure? I assume it was prototyped
Sorry, I should have said I called the procedure - I have done
it both as a
prototyped procedure and also as a stored procedure. Same
results with both.



Eileen Beckwith
Vermont Information Processing
eileen@xxxxxxxxxx


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.