Re: Change commitment control after compilation

[Michael Ryan <michaelrtr@xxxxxxxxx>]

The Cisco Kid was on that album.


On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 2:09 PM, D*B <dieter.bender@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> <Henrik>
> what is wrong is that most IBM I shops and most IBM I software dosn't use
> commitment
> </Henrik>
>
> If this is true, then IMHO there seems something to be wrong with most IBM
> i shops and IBM I software => one of the points, the as400 is going down
> and dieing!"
>
> <Jeff>
> To use commitment control without causing major potential issues, requires
> that the entire application be designed for commitment control.
> </Jeff>
>
> that's simply not true!!! just seperate both parts by activation group and
> start your commit definition with Activation group scope and you could
> develop your new parts of application with the technology use since > 30
> years outside the as400 Ghetto. Did you ever think about, why the world of
> as400 is a ghetto???
>
> Go to sleep again!
>
> Best regards
>
> D*B
> --
> This is the RPG programming on the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries) (RPG400-L)
> mailing list
> To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
> visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
> or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
> Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
> at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.