×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
On Fri, Dec 6, 2013 at 1:15 PM, Englander, Douglas
<Douglas_Englander@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
If people steeped in other languages can't figure out what
is meant by *ON and *OFF, then we, as developers, have
bigger issues.
Indeed. This is one of the *least* confusing aspects of RPG programming.
Maybe we should ask IBM to include *TRUE and *FALSE as
additional ways to signify *ON and *OFF.
I guess it's not a horrible idea, but I really don't see the need.
*ON and *OFF are plenty. Would *TRUE and *FALSE only be valid in
strictly Boolean contexts, or would they be exact aliases for *ON and
*OFF (which can be used in character contexts)? Either way, they
would just clutter the language for little value.
John
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.