I don't think anyone answered your question.
Specifically, if you create a program with a main routine you need to
specify LR if you do not have a RETURN specified.
Do you have the return op code anywhere in the program, but the code is just
not being executed?
Paul Therrien
Andeco Software, LLC
-----Original Message-----
From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of John Yeung
Sent: Thursday, November 21, 2013 7:54 PM
To: RPG programming on the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries)
Subject: Re: INLR no longer required?
On Thu, Nov 21, 2013 at 7:41 PM, Jerry C. Adams <midrange@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
My experience (V5R4 and earlier) was that RETURN left the program in
memory; i.e., available quickly for another invocation.
Sure, but the OP said his program didn't STOP. To me, that means it did not
even return. If he's using "didn't stop" to mean something else, I'm sure
he'll let us know. Also, he was surprised it compiled at all.
John
--
This is the RPG programming on the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries) (RPG400-L)
mailing list To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe,
unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit:
http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at
http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.
midrange.com
