|
I've heard Carol Woodbury recommend doing a setgid instead of swapping
profiles... that way, if your job should crash or something before
swapping back, there's a much lower risk. You're just running with a
different group id, that's all.
I'm surprised when you say that changing the effective UID would be less
intensive vs. swapping profiles. I would've thought these would do
exactly the same thing under the covers? Changing group, yeah, I can
see that being less intensive, but... changing uid? Is that true? Is
it really less resource intensive?
On 10/8/2013 3:31 PM, Vernon Hamberg wrote:
To the swapped-profile idea - I think it was an ISV support person at
IBM who said to change the effective GID or UID of a job - this is just
like swapping profiles, just less intensive. This is done with one or
the other API, qsyseteuid or qsysetegid.
HTH
Vern
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.