Re: Optional Parms in Sub Procedure

"nonsense" ?

Sorry - don't agree Rory - it is a terrific feature and can provide a huge performance boost.

And if you "do it right" and use RTNPARM there is no problem - at least within RPG.


On 2013-09-20, at 2:33 PM, Rory Hewitt <rory.hewitt@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

...and let's not forget that RTNPARM nonsense, which can mess things up
further...


On Fri, Sep 20, 2013 at 11:00 AM, Scott Klement
<rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>wrote:

Yes, use %PARMS

If you're on 7.1, you can use it in conjunction with %PARMNUM, too.

if %PARMS >= %PARMNUM(MyParameter);
// parm was passed
endif;

on older releases you have to know the parameter number.

if %PARMS >= 5;
// parm number 5 was passed.
endif;


On 9/20/2013 12:44 PM, Jeff Young wrote:

All,
In a sub procedure, I have some parms defined as *nopass.
How do I test the number of parms passed to it?
Can I use %Parms?

Thanks,

--
This is the RPG programming on the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries) (RPG400-L)
mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.

--
Rory Hewitt

http://www.linkedin.com/in/roryhewitt
--
This is the RPG programming on the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries) (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.

Jon Paris

www.partner400.com
www.SystemiDeveloper.com