× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



My company chose recently to go to e-mail based on a cloud-hosted outlook solution.
So far, works well.

-----Original Message-----
From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of John Yeung
Sent: Tuesday, April 23, 2013 3:27 PM
To: RPG programming on the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries)
Subject: Re: why rpg and not cobol

On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 4:56 PM, Stone, Joel <Joel.Stone@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Sorry I don't understand. MS proprietary stuff i[s] on the downslope.
Think MS Word, MS Excel, MS Outlook. Ten years ago EVERYONE used
outlook. Now it is a fraction of what it was. People are RUNNING to
gmail and others like it where they don't have to mess with the
administration headaches.

Calm down. You're exaggerating. Excel is extremely strong in the real world. I can't say how much Outlook has declined, but it's far from a dire picture for Outlook. I can tell you that businesses are definitely NOT running to Gmail. Actually even individuals are getting a little disenchanted with Gmail for personal use. (Though it's still the top dog in that arena because there aren't a lot of competitors that are both free and better than Gmail, certainly not many that are well-known.)

College kids grow up learning gmail and google docs. They don't know
what MS stuff is outside the Windows OS.

Google Docs has gotten better, but isn't better than MS Office. In particular, the Google spreadsheet is NOT an adequate competitor to Excel. Seriously, it is not nearly as good and it is not making a dent. (Maybe a scratch at best.)

MS open stuff is still going strong - C#, C, visual studio stuff.

Open? Try "proprietary, with watered-down free versions". Granted, the free versions are perfectly good for most people, including many professional developers.

But NONE of the MS products are proprietary to the extent of RPG.

This is where you get to actual meat. This is actually true, and not an exaggeration, and not misleading.

I don't agree with Mark Murphy either. Microsoft is definitely not "as proprietary as you can get". But most of what you said is just as ridiculous.

Companies generally like to be proprietary (even the "more open"
ones). That's their nature. Sometimes it works. Sometimes it doesn't.

John
--
This is the RPG programming on the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries) (RPG400-L) mailing list To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.




As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.