|
Hi Jerry -
On Thu, 14 Feb 2013 20:18:39 -0600, "Jerry C. Adams"
<midrange@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
It has been awhile, and perhaps I am misremembering (the little gray cellshung;
are dying off quickly). But I thought I had a program once that just
i.e., shouldn't have taken more than a few second to run, but was still
running after I got back from lunch. Went into debug and it was hung in a
procedure where I had forgotten to put a RETURN. Just sat there asking,
"Okay, what the heck am I supposed to do now.
If you have an RPG program that uses the cycle (even implicitly) and
the program neither does a return nor ends a cycle with LR on, it will
start a new cycle. (The compiler ensures that the program contains an
exit mechanism but can't ensure that it will ever actually execute.)
But that's not true of procedures because they don't have the cycle.
However if a program whiche is running forever because the cycle issue
calls a procedure, it very well could be in that procedure when you
look at it.
Ken
Opinions expressed are my own and do not necessarily represent the views
of my employer or anyone in their right mind.
--
This is the RPG programming on the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries) (RPG400-L)
mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.