|
Hi Luis -
On Fri, 11 Jan 2013 12:50:11 -0430, Luis Rodriguez
<luisro58@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>I love /FREE, but there are some things that, IMHO, could have been made
>more compatible with the "original" RPG. For example, using an additional
>extender code (e.g. EVAL(T) ) that replicated the non-FREE behaviour of
>Z-ADD would have avoided searching for a somewhat "kludgy" workaround.
There aren't many situations where it is desired to truncate the high
order digits.
For overflow situations where the exact value is not required,
generally the desired behavior is to set the value to the highest
value that the field will hold, as various people recommended.
Though I think that no one who suggested setting the highest value
also suggested setting the lowest value (most negative value) for a
field overflow of a negative number. While a negative number overflow
is generally less common than a positive overflow, it shouldn't be
overlooked.
Ken
Opinions expressed are my own and do not necessarily represent the views
of my employer or anyone in their right mind.
--
This is the RPG programming on the IBM i (AS/400 and iSeries) (RPG400-L)
mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.