I've seen these problems, too, Jon. Always when the programmer hard-coded
the definition of the LDA in the program. That is, the LDA was "flexible"
for each procedure.
On the other hand, I have never had an issue with using the LDA because the
definition is defined in a copy book so it is always the same regardless of
which program is using it.
That said, I use it only for passing things like report selections from one
program to another, not data.
Jerry C. Adams
IBM i Programmer/Analyst
Nothing of importance happened today. -George III's diary entry for 4 July
1776
--
A&K Wholesale
Murfreesboro, TN
615-867-5070
-----Original Message-----
From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Jon Paris
Sent: Thursday, May 24, 2012 11:38 AM
To: rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Passing data structure to batch job
On 2012-05-24, at 11:51 AM, rpg400-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
I would suggest you look at the *LDA for this.
Go wash your mouth out with soap young man!
Jon (recently badly burned by _two_ apps that both thought the LDA was a
good way to pass data) Paris
www.partner400.com
www.SystemiDeveloper.com
--
This is the RPG programming on the IBM i / System i (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or
change list options,
visit:
http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at
http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.