× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. RPG400-L
  3. March 2012

Re: passing parameters longer than expected

On 3/27/2012 11:20 AM, Dave wrote:
Le 27 mars 2012 15:58, Joe Pluta<joepluta@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> a écrit :
The problem is the use of the CONST keyword. By specifying CONST you
specifically told the compiler to ignore any data past the 40A; in
effect, you asked it to do a MOVEL (or EVAL) of your 100A into a
temporary 40A field and call with it. Had you not had CONST on the
prototype, the compiler would have indeed complained.

I know, and leaving it on means the programmer complains. I just
thought that prototyping was supposed to protect me from the sort of
error I made, but I shall try to remember these finer details.

:)

"I thought this safety belt was supposed to protect me?!"

"You weren't wearing it."

"Well, yes, because it's too uncomfortable. But still, it should have protected me!"

CONST removes (or at least greatly loosens) the safety belt of parameter type checking.

Joe

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow-Ups:
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.