|
On 2/16/2012 12:26 PM, Mike Wills wrote:
Two users have been reporting the same problem with one of myapplications.
I have a very complicated subprocedure that calculates the taxes on anto
invoice. I had one of the users try a few things, but I can't the program
to crash on-demand (though it did several times though the testing).
...
I am by no means an expert with activation groups. Should I change this
a named activation group? ActGrp(ARACTGRP)
I can't imagine even a far-fetched scenario where a numeric overflow
problem (MCH1210) could be _corrected_ by using a different activation
group.
Depending on the nature of the problem, using a different activation
group might make the problem go away, at least temporarily. But it
wouldn't correct it, at most it would move it or hide it.
--
Barbara
--
This is the RPG programming on the IBM i / System i (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.
midrange.com
