ok - then - looks like I have some more reading to do - thanks
MLR
From: "Tyler, Matt" <matt.tyler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
To: "RPG programming on the IBM i / System i" <rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 01/26/2012 03:45 PM
Subject: RE: XML-INTO with %HANDLER
Sent by: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
I had to parse a four large Lawson Report Writer XML document (up to
several hundred megs big ). Its structure was not deep and was
consistence enough but repeated an unknown number of times. I first
coded the XML-INTO with a handler. During testing it took about 3
minutes for the documents to be processed. I ended up going to the
XML-SAX (I forget the exact reason but it was because of the document I
had to process), when I was done figuring out all the needed handler
code the same documents processed in 30 seconds.
It was more work with the XML-SAX but I learned a lot from the
experience.
Below are code samples I used to build my experience with the XML-SAX
parser.
http://code.midrange.com/6ad9d425e7.html
http://code.midrange.com/36f1294cf9.html
http://code.midrange.com/2258cfb028.html
try them out.
Thanks, Matt
-----Original Message-----
From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of
MRiggins@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Sent: Thursday, January 26, 2012 2:04 PM
To: RPG programming on the IBM i / System i
Subject: Re: XML-INTO with %HANDLER
Are you using %handler because the PO data structure is too big when you
make the arrays as big as you need? (Just curious.)
Yes that is correct.
The example I sent just showed one POChange set. There will be multiple
POChange sets and I wanted to be able to process an XML file that had an
unknown number of these sets.
Thanks,
MLR
From: Barbara Morris <bmorris@xxxxxxxxxx>
To: rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Date: 01/26/2012 02:59 PM
Subject: Re: XML-INTO with %HANDLER
Sent by: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
On 1/26/2012 12:07 PM, MRiggins@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
that's good info, I'm concerned that I have 3 nodes at the same level
of
ChangePODetail.
I have the ChangePODetail, SplitPODetail and NewPODetail - is that
possible to handle in this way?
No, if you need to handle the ChangePODetail's using %handler, you'd
have to handle anything at the same level separately.
Are you using %handler because the PO data structure is too big when you
make the arrays as big as you need? (Just curious.)
midrange.com
