×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
My gut says 'No'
-----Original Message-----
From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
On Behalf Of Jerry C. Adams
Sent: Monday, November 14, 2011 9:13 AM
To: RPG400-L
Subject: No Lock With Update?
This may be a silly question, but I cannot find the answer (or a hint) in
the manual.
If one uses READ(n) or CHAIN(n) against a table that has been defined for
update, can one still use the UPDATE or DELETE op-codes against the
retrieved record. All that the manual says is that the record is retrieved
without locking it. It would seem to me that, since the program has the
record, it could still be updated or deleted.
Normally I wouldn't try something like this, but I am working on a process
where it is a viable option so I was curious.
Thanks.
Jerry C. Adams
IBM i Programmer/Analyst
There was never a great genius without a tincture of madness. -Aristotle
--
A&K Wholesale
Murfreesboro, TN
615-867-5070
--
This is the RPG programming on the IBM i / System i (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or
change list options,
visit:
http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at
http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.
midrange.com
