×

Good News Everybody!

The new search engine is LIVE!

Please report any problems to david (at) midrange.com.




The only reason would be to pass the pointer in lieu of the qualified name to avoid re-resolving the object. The pointer would essentially be opaque but would allow the system to more quickly execute the lookup. I don't know that it would actually provide any benefit; my guess is that like program resolution the system only resolves when necessary but I don't know for sure.

Joe

Not sure what you'd do with a pointer to a user index even if you could
get one? Write your own index traversal code? (If it's not obvious --
a user index is an *index*, like you'd have in a database file. It's
not a simple flat contiguous piece of data.)

On 7/5/2011 1:01 PM, Joe Pluta wrote:
This seems like the best approach. I don't know if I can lock the user
space into memory, but if it gets used enough it should be in memory
anyway. And the user space wins over the user index because I can
retrieve the pointer. There doesn't seem to be a corresponding QUSPTRUS
API for a user index.


As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2026 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.