× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Another thing to keep in mind is "The customer is always right. At
least until they change their mind."

Gary


-----Original Message-----
From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Hockchai Lim
Sent: Thursday, April 14, 2011 1:51 PM
To: rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Reasons for using RPGIV

Most will probably disagree but this is from expriences:

I think your best option is try not to get into a head to head battle
with
her about how bad RPG400 is and how super duper RPGIV is. My guess is
that
every compelling reasons you come up with will likely to get shut down.
The
best approach for me seems to be to agree with her that RPG400 should
remain
as one of the primary focus. But the shop should not ban RPGIV or free
form. This will allow growth and not letting shop get too behind on RPG

release. Crack open a little bit will go a long way.

Here are some example on how you can get shut down easily:
1) Local variable ==>
Why do we need that. It is confusing especially some developers create
mutilple local variables with same name.

2) if else indent ==>
We can use STRSRCHLT to indent the RPG400 source easily. You can't even
use
STRSRCHLT on free form. If developer does not indent in free form
correctly, it ends up a mess.

3) Prototype ==>
You meant to tell me that everytime I need to call an external program,
I've
to declare the prototype. What a pain.

4) Long field name ==>
Why would you want such long field name. Most of us already know short
file
field name by heart. Mixing long a short will just create confusion.

. . . .



"sjl" <sjl_abc@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:mailman.38471.1302645343.2702.rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx...
I am involved in a philosophical argument with one of the lead
developers
in
the JDE/Oracle V5R4 shop where I have been working as a consultant for
the
last five years.

If I understand her correctly, her argument is that as a JDE shop that
we
should NOT be using RPGIV at all, and that we should be writing /all/
code
in RPG/400. I don't necessarily disagree, in the case of simple mods
to
an
existing JDE program, but I would argue that /all/ new development
should
be
done in free-form RPGIV.

Background:
We currently have a mixture of OPM and RPGIV code.

Some of the RPGIV is programs that have simply been run through
CVTRPGSRC
to
convert them to fixed-form ILE source, other RPGIV code includes
several
including entire sub-systems which have been written entirely in
free-form
RPGIV utilizing service programs and binding source.

Other than hitting the RPG/400 compiler limits on the number of
arrays,
tables, and files (which necessitates converting the program to RPGIV
in
order for it to compile successfully), she wants me to present five
compelling reasons to justify the use of RPGIV, particularly free-form

RPGIV
code.

Any thoughts? I need ammunition!

- sjl






As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.