RE: Socket Recv Question

Nagle disable
It does not seem to matter
I tried it both ways

~Zach

-----Original Message-----
From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx [mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Scott Klement
Sent: Wednesday, February 23, 2011 2:50 PM
To: RPG programming on the IBM i / System i
Subject: Re: Socket Recv Question

Have you disabled Nagle's algorithm? That may be throwing off your benchmarks.

On 2/23/2011 2:31 PM, Zachary Johnson wrote:

Hi Scott, thanks for the reply. Yes, using SOCK_STREAM. I still think
it's odd though that the short request would take longer to arrive on
the socket than the large request. It's driving me up the wall that I
have no other explanation other than "that's how it works". Thanks
again for the response.

--
This is the RPG programming on the IBM i / System i (RPG400-L) mailing list To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.

NOTICE: This electronic mail message and any files transmitted with it are intended
exclusively for the individual or entity to which it is addressed. The message,
together with any attachment, may contain confidential and/or privileged information.
Any unauthorized review, use, printing, saving, copying, disclosure or distribution
is strictly prohibited. If you have received this message in error, please
immediately advise the sender by reply email and delete all copies.