|
From: Scott Klement
Would you rather have a "big bang" (all loading work done at once) or a
"gradual spread" ...
Personally, I'd rather have a gradual spread. I don't know of a good way
to
measure the amount of time it takes to load programs and service programs,
but
my command line perception is that smaller, less complex programs and
service
programs load faster.
The OP mentioned A/P, which I assume refers to Accounts Payable, which I'd
call
a "product" as opposed to an "application"; where application might be one
program loaded from a menu, as opposed to all items on a menu. At the
moment a
menu item is loaded, would it make sense to load one big service program
for an
entire product?
-Nathan
--
This is the RPG programming on the IBM i / System i (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit: http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.