× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



Folks, I have often wondered and have never found reference to the internal
workings of errno. My specific question is whether it is safe to obtain a
pointer to errno only one time, and then reference the based value from then
on. It makes sense to me that errno's value would be at a static location
and won't float around in memory, but - again - I haven't seen any guarantee
of that. So in my programs every time I want to measure success of certain
operations, it's the old retrieve-the-address-and-test-the-value approach.
This really is like the C approach except that in C it can be a single
instruction ( if (*errno < 1) . ).



Any takers from folks in the know?



Dennis E. Lovelady
AIM/Skype: delovelady MSN: fastcounter@xxxxxxxxxxxx
<http://www.linkedin.com/in/dennislovelady>
www.linkedin.com/in/dennislovelady --
Using Windows is better than eating glass*
- *Depending upon the quality of the glass.




As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.