Re: Astonished by embedded sql -- RPG400-L

× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.

Subject: Re: Astonished by embedded sql
From: Charles Wilt <charles.wilt@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 12 Oct 2010 09:28:34 -0400
List-archive: <http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l>
List-help: <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=help>
List-id: RPG programming on the IBM i / System i <rpg400-l.midrange.com>
List-post: <mailto:rpg400-l@midrange.com>
List-subscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l>, <mailto:rpg400-l-request@midrange.com?subject=unsubscribe>

A CHAIN will work fine.

You'd get the first record with with key value, same as you would with
a SETLL + READE.

Charles

On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 8:20 AM, Schutte, Michael D
<Michael_Schutte@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

To answer the other question, a chain wouldn't work because the original programmer must have thought that he could get multiple records from this file based on the where clause. That being said, a regular I/O setll and reade would have been just as good.

As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

Follow-Ups:

RE: Astonished by embedded sql , Schutte, Michael D

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.