RE: MODS Likerec

["Florin Todor - YYZ Concord" <ftodor@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Thank you, Scott, your assumptions are right; this is what I was trying
to do (I am not sure I understood exactly your last sentence, though: do
you suggest using a pointer or something?)

I will start studying and using what Birgitta and Jon advised: array DS.
Hopefully I will make it works. 
  
 
Florin Todor
 

-----Original Message-----
From: rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx
[mailto:rpg400-l-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxx] On Behalf Of Scott Klement
Sent: Monday, September 27, 2010 1:16 PM
To: RPG programming on the IBM i / System i
Subject: Re: MODS Likerec

Hi Florin,

the problem with LIKEREC is that it implicitly qualifies the fieldnames.

  I'm assuming you are doing something like this:

   D MyMods          ds                  occurs(9999)
   D                                     likerec(myRecFmt:*input)

Therefore, you'll have fields named

    MyMods.field1
    MyMods.field2
    ..etc..

And file reads will go into

    field1
    field2
    ..etc..

And since these are different field names from the ones in your DS, 
there's nothing "automagic" going on.  If you want the fields to be the 
same, stop using LIKEREC.  Alternately, read directly into the DS 
instead of expecting the fields to match on the I-spec.



On 9/27/2010 10:26 AM, Florin Todor - YYZ Concord wrote:
> Before posting this question I hesitated a lot, because I know it is
> something basic for most of you; unfortunately I couldn't find the
> answer myself, so please help!
>
> This is the idea: I have a subfile populated by the user. I want to
> insert some records between already existed records if some criteria
is
> met. My idea was to read the entire subfile and to save it to a MODS
> defined with LIKEREC(the subfile record name), clear the subfile and
> repopulated it one by one record (reading MODS) and inserting, when
> needed, the new subfile records.
>
> My problem is I cannot retrieve the MODS. I do an %OCCUR(mods-name) =
1
> and a WRITE the subfile record. In this moment, I thought the subfile
is
> automagically populated because they have the same field names... but
> it's not!