×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
Yes, that's right. One cannot (directly) add subfields to a data structure
that's defined with LIKEDS, LIKEREC or EXTNAME keywords.
The only alternative of which I'm aware (other than the prior pointer-based
suggestion) is to hand-roll the DS definition (all [desired] fields of the
PF). Should be safe to put into /copy (/include) code since the OP has said
that nobody dares change the file-from-hell.
Dennis Lovelady
http://www.linkedin.com/in/dennislovelady
--
"The holy passion of friendship is so sweet and steady and loyal and
enduring in nature that it will last through a whole lifetime, if not asked
to lend money."
-- Mark Twain
My guess is that LIKEREC is messing things up. The error message
implies that the previous DS has somehow been terminated (as if
another stand-alone definition had been inserted) and the 'array'
field is not being recognised as part of that DS and therefore is
being treated as a stand-alone field. That seems like a defect to me
so perhaps you are missing PTFs or a maybe PMR is in order?
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact
[javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.