RE: Message from RPG

I think your point is that because the call QMHSNDPM is inside a
procedure it will be that procedure name that will appear on the F9
details so even though the module and program may be what is desired,
in a multi-procedure program you'll lose the real sender information
anyway. That's a valid point and the only solution to that is to call

Exactly. Thanks for putting that so succinctly.

To be honest, I've used both direct calls and wrappers and I vacillate
between both methods. Neither of them is a perfect solution.

Well, if RPG had a macro function like ... ummm some "less feature-rich
language," then the inline routine wouldn't seem so bad. (Sorry. Had to.)

I've always wanted a means of specifying that FROM information in a message.
I'm sure there's good reason that IBM have not chosen to provide that
capability, but (to plagiarize the Beach Boys) wouldn't it be nice?

Dennis Lovelady
http://www.linkedin.com/in/dennislovelady
--
"I don't want to achieve immortality through my work, I want to achieve it
through not dying."
-- Woody Allen