|
Isn't that pretty much what VALUE does? I realize there are some subtle
differences between "ALWAYS CONST" and "VALUE", but I can't see why
those differences would matter to you.
Jon Paris wrote:
> What I mean by this is a form of CONST that _always_ takes a copy and
> passes that. Right now it only produces a copy if there is a mismatch
> between the parm passed and that expected. I'd like to be able to
> guarantee that my data doesn't get changed no matter what happens in
> the called routine.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.
This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].
Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.