× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.



A new function may be usefull, sonething like "SCAM" for SCAN MULTIPLE.

Functions usualy return 1 value, in older times the value was returned
in the "acumulator" or in the register where it can be used directly in
arithmetic. An array requires a pointer, but so does a string.


M. Lazarus wrote:
Hans,

Do you think that for this particular function (%SCAN), allowing
this flexibility would be a bad or nasty thing?

-mark


At 1/11/10 04:30 PM, you wrote:
M. Lazarus wrote:
Simon,

Although not something that I use a lot, probably the most useful
opcode that does not have a full equivalent is the SCAN opcode, with a
numeric array as the result field. I don't understand why that one got
short-changed during the implementation of the %Scan() BIF.

I can only think of one other programming language where a built-in
function may return either a scalar or a list. That is just one of many
features that makes Perl such a nasty language to use.

Cheers! Hans



As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...

Follow-Ups:
Replies:

Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.