× The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.


  1.  Home
  2. RPG400-L
  3. December 2009

Re: Date formats

If you use numeric fields for your dates I think mmddyy has a more 'natural' sort then ddmmyy. Of course, being from the US, I'm biased. :)

Glenn

Carel Teijgeler wrote:
I think the illogical *USA date format is more a statistical solution to
compare months' profits over the years.

Or is there another reason for this format?

With regards,
Carel Teijgeler


*********** REPLY SEPARATOR ***********

On 14-12-2009 at 12:47 Jon Paris wrote:

"some countries"? How about "just about all". MDY is such an unusual
format that in IBM date terms the four digit year version is
designated as *USA!

When I was working on IBM's Y2K offerings the contractor that produced the
tool did not originally include an MDY version as they had never
heard of it. As a result (and luckily for them) they had never
encountered the idiotic multiply by 10000.01 conversion method either.




As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.

This thread ...
Follow-Ups:
Replies:
Follow On AppleNews
Return to Archive home page | Return to MIDRANGE.COM home page

This mailing list archive is Copyright 1997-2024 by midrange.com and David Gibbs as a compilation work. Use of the archive is restricted to research of a business or technical nature. Any other uses are prohibited. Full details are available on our policy page. If you have questions about this, please contact [javascript protected email address].

Operating expenses for this site are earned using the Amazon Associate program and Google Adsense.