×
The internal search function is temporarily non-functional. The current search engine is no longer viable and we are researching alternatives.
As a stop gap measure, we are using Google's custom search engine service.
If you know of an easy to use, open source, search engine ... please contact support@midrange.com.
Jon
thanks for your reply
I have to agree with your point here.
Alan Shore
Programmer/Analyst, Distribution
E:AShore@xxxxxxxxxxx
P:(631) 200-5019
C:(631) 880-8640
"If you're going through Hell, keep going" - Winston Churchill
Jon Paris
<jon.paris@partne
r400.com> To
Sent by: rpg400-l@xxxxxxxxxxxx
rpg400-l-bounces@ cc
midrange.com
Subject
Re: D-spec using the same file name
11/17/2009 05:19 twice
PM
Please respond to
RPG programming
on the IBM i /
System i
<rpg400-l@midrang
e.com>
Then that really is a Commitment Control scenario.
Maybe I'm just paranoid - but the notion of cross-dependent changes
without CC I just find too scary.
Jon Paris
www.Partner400.com
www.SystemiDeveloper.com
On 17-Nov-09, at 3:48 PM, rpg400-l-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
I do in fact need to lock both records. One for update, the other
one for
delete.
I'm not saying that RPG cannot handle this process, It just means
that I
have to create a new logical with a key that another file already has.
--
This is the RPG programming on the IBM i / System i (RPG400-L) mailing list
To post a message email: RPG400-L@xxxxxxxxxxxx
To subscribe, unsubscribe, or change list options,
visit:
http://lists.midrange.com/mailman/listinfo/rpg400-l
or email: RPG400-L-request@xxxxxxxxxxxx
Before posting, please take a moment to review the archives
at
http://archive.midrange.com/rpg400-l.
As an Amazon Associate we earn from qualifying purchases.